Skip to main content

How to be a Cultured Reader: Candide, or Optimism – Voltaire

This is a pedantic series of entries about classic novels you should read if you wish to make an impression at uptown soirees catering to cultured types. Look on the bright side: there is no such thing as a born ignoramus. 


Candide, or Optimism – Voltaire
Year of publication: 1759
Edition: Penguin Classics, 2005

Plot: Candide is a naïve young man shaped by his tutor Pangloss’ philosophy positing that ‘all is for the best.’ When Candide ventures out into the big bad world to face his demons, he is thwarted by outrageous (and often hilarious) disasters ranging from earthquakes to the Inquisition. At the end of his harrowing journey, he learns to question his tutor’s stance and grows into maturity.

Why this novel:
1. This is the European novel of enlightenment that raised the question of the individual’s right to freedom of expression. It is the forefather of all satirical works, and was for the longest time perceived as a threat by the Church and various governments (it’s temporarily banned in America in 1929). It is a subversive little work that questions philosophy, religion, politics, and human behaviour. The novel’s chief target is German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who theorised that since God is omnipresent and omnipotent, the actual world, despite its atrocities and horrors, must be the best of all possible worlds. This is obviously a religious (and somewhat deluded) attempt at reconciling evil with a supposedly merciful God. Candide shows the reader how preposterous the standpoint is by lampooning Leibniz (disguised as Pangloss). The result is often laugh-out-loud funny.

2. The novel is now seen as an early advocate of freedom of speech. In its time it was seen as seditious and dangerous, and many attempts were made by the Church to eliminate it. (Voltaire published the novel under a pseudonym.) This is of course a fate that many modern authors know well (Rushdie anyone?). The massacre of the Charlie Hebdo editorial staff in Paris by Islamist terrorists once again reminds us that organised religion is the greatest enemy to the right of freedom of expression. It is ironic to see that nothing about human nature has changed between Voltaire’s time and ours. The novel is indispensable to every man (or woman) who refuses to bow down to oppression and tyranny.

3. It often presents a bleak but realistic view of mankind – couched in Voltaire’s unique sardonic sense of humour. In Chapter 21, Candide asks the following of Monsieur Martin, an amateur philosopher he met in Suriname:

‘Do you think,’ said Candide, ‘that men have always massacred one another, as they do today? That they have always been liars, cheats, traitors, ingrates and brigands, as well as weaklings, shirkers, cowards, backbiters, gluttons, drunkards, misers and social climbers, in addition to being bloodthirsty, slanderous, fanatical, debauched, hypocritical and downright stupid?’ – ‘But don’t you accept,’ replied Martin, ‘that hawks have always killed pigeons when they come across them?’ – ‘Without a doubt,’ said Candide – ‘Well, then,’ said Martin, ‘if hawks have always had the same nature, why do you expect men to change theirs?’ (59)

This is Voltaire’s attack on the Christian doctrine of the Fall, which claims that Man had been good and innocent until he was corrupted by freedom and desire. He was of the opinion that the essence of Man’s character has always persisted unchanged. In other words, evil has always resided within Man – Fall or no Fall.


Conclusion: Satire is an art form as well as a means to re-evaluate human behaviour. It is the only effective weapon against religious fundamentalism, turning an abstract notion like freedom of speech into something concrete and capable of taking down the biggest bullies on the playground. It is an art form every man, woman, and child must master, and there isn’t a better place to start than Candide

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Approaching Haruki Murakami’s “Kafka on the Shore” the Jungian Way

“The world of gods and spirits is truly nothing but the collective unconscious inside me.” – Carl Jung, On the Tibetan Book of the Dead What appears to be supernatural and surrealistic in Haruki Murakami’s Kafka on the Shore  does not have to remain that way once we accept that in Murakami’s fictional world, the natural and the supernatural often cross paths and become one single unity. In the previous three entries on the novel, I have extensively discussed its relation to Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex . But here I intend to explain why the supernatural should in fact be deemed natural, and how this reasoning is a direct reference to the theories of Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung and German philosopher G.W. F. Hegel, both of whom are mentioned in the novel. Carl Jung’s psychological theory on the “collective unconscious” (the notion positing that all humans – regardless of race and culture – share a psyche containing “latent predispositions towards identical reactions” [10])

The Sound of Alienation: Rainer Maria Rilke’s “The Voices”

In the nine “Voices” poems (“Die Stemmen,” 1902), we find Rilke speaking out for those who have suffered pain and injustice. He insists that in order for them to be heard, they need to “advertise” themselves, and this should be done through singing, or songs – like the castrati (referred to as “these cut ones”) who sing to God and compel him to stay and listen. This message is found in the “Title Leaf” – an introduction of sorts to the nine songs. It is tempting to read the nine songs (“Beggar’s,” “Blind Man’s,” “Drunkard’s,” “Suicide’s,” “Widow’s,” “Idiot’s,” “Orphan Girl’s,” “Dwarf’s,” “Leper’s”) as a collection of poetic pleas for social awareness. This is due to Rilke’s “casting choices”; he has selected society’s most conspicuous outcasts as the main speakers of his poems. When, for instance, the beggar in “The Beggar’s Song” says, “I go always from door to door/rain-soaked and sun-scorched,” we are induced to sympathise with his downtrodden fate. The same can be said for

Murakami Salutes Orwell: How "1Q84" Pays Homage to "1984" (Part 2)

Here the reader arrives at the junction where Murakami’s work crosses from the metaphysical to the real and tangible, for in the single-moon world we have also had the misfortune of witnessing writers persecuted for their ability to tell a different “truth.” Salman Rushdie’s fate after the publication of The Satanic Verse is well-documented and needs no reiteration. A more discriminate look at literary history gives us several more voices hushed by the Authorities: Turkish author and Nobel Prize-winner Orhan Pamuk was arrested for comments about the massacres of Armenians in the First World War. Nigerian protest author Ken Saro-Wiwa was tried by a military tribunal and hanged. Yu Jie, author of China's Best Actor: Wen Jiabao , a controversial book that cast a critical light on the premier, landed in hot water with the Chinese authorities, and had to emigrate to the USA for his own safety. His close friend and Nobel Prize-winning literary critic Liu Xiaobo called for politic