Skip to main content

Youth Matters: W. B. Yeats’ “When You Are Old” and “Politics”

Almost half a lifetime went by between the compositions of “When You Are Old” and “Politics,” and yet it is startlingly clear from the diction of both poems that their writer, whose focus might have shifted from the personal to the political, was as preoccupied with the subject of (lost) youth in his last days as when he was in his thirties.  

When You Are Old (from The Rose, 1893)
When you are old and grey and full of sleep,
And nodding by the fire, take down this book,
And slowly read, and dream of the soft look
Your eyes had once, and of their shadows deep;

How many loved your moments of glad grace,
And loved your beauty with love false or true,
But one man loved the pilgrim soul in you,
And loved the sorrows of your changing face;

And bending down beside the glowing bars,
Murmur, a little sadly, how Love fled
And paced upon the mountains overhead
And hid his face amid a crowd of stars.

In “When You Are Old,” the speaker is addressing a woman (biographers have claimed this to be Yeats’ unrequited love Maud Gonne) and telling her about impending old age (“When you are old and grey and full of sleep”). The speaker’s tone is tenderly persuasive: “Take down this book / And slowly read, and dream of the soft look / Your eyes had once…” This suggests that the speaker is instructing the woman, who is not yet old, to imagine a scene where she is old and reminiscing about her youth (“And dream of the soft look / Your eyes had once”).  In her reminiscences, she is asked to reflect on how many have “loved your beauty with love false or true.” The speaker, however, insists that there is only one man who has loved her past her beauty (“the pilgrim soul in you,” “the sorrows of your changing face”), and the reader may at this point infer that the man in question is the mysterious speaker himself.

The last stanza is weighed down by a tone of old-age remorse. The woman is said to “murmur, a little sadly” about how Love has forsaken her. The abstract nature of the last two lines is intentional, pressing home the point that when Love is lost, it is irretrievable.

“Politics,” written in the poet’s slightly more advanced age, bears the same stamp of longing for lost youth:

Politics (from Last Poems, 1939)
'In our time the destiny of man prevents its meanings
in political terms.' -- Thomas Mann.


How can I, that girl standing there,
My attention fix
On Roman or on Russian
Or on Spanish politics?
Yet here's a travelled man that knows
What he talks about,
And there's a politician
That has read and thought,
And maybe what they say is true
Of war and war's alarms,
But O that I were young again
And held her in my arms!

The speaker, presumably Yeats himself, asks rhetorically how he can “fix” his attention on politics with “that girl standing there.” He accepts that there are men out there (German writer Thomas Mann may be one of them) who have read, talked, and thought deeply about political matters and warfare; but for himself he is not sure if politics is what life is about (“And maybe what they say is true”). The poem’s final two lines are clear: the speaker wishes he were young again so that he could fall in love and embrace “that girl standing there.” It is a life-affirming poem that pays tribute to the power of youth and love; yet there is a melancholy whisper to it telling us that once youth is gone, all one can do is to fantasise about it in perpetual regret.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Approaching Haruki Murakami’s “Kafka on the Shore” the Jungian Way

“The world of gods and spirits is truly nothing but the collective unconscious inside me.” – Carl Jung, On the Tibetan Book of the Dead What appears to be supernatural and surrealistic in Haruki Murakami’s Kafka on the Shore  does not have to remain that way once we accept that in Murakami’s fictional world, the natural and the supernatural often cross paths and become one single unity. In the previous three entries on the novel, I have extensively discussed its relation to Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex . But here I intend to explain why the supernatural should in fact be deemed natural, and how this reasoning is a direct reference to the theories of Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung and German philosopher G.W. F. Hegel, both of whom are mentioned in the novel. Carl Jung’s psychological theory on the “collective unconscious” (the notion positing that all humans – regardless of race and culture – share a psyche containing “latent predispositions towards identical reactions” [1...

Murakami Salutes Orwell: How "1Q84" Pays Homage to "1984" (Part 2)

Here the reader arrives at the junction where Murakami’s work crosses from the metaphysical to the real and tangible, for in the single-moon world we have also had the misfortune of witnessing writers persecuted for their ability to tell a different “truth.” Salman Rushdie’s fate after the publication of The Satanic Verse is well-documented and needs no reiteration. A more discriminate look at literary history gives us several more voices hushed by the Authorities: Turkish author and Nobel Prize-winner Orhan Pamuk was arrested for comments about the massacres of Armenians in the First World War. Nigerian protest author Ken Saro-Wiwa was tried by a military tribunal and hanged. Yu Jie, author of China's Best Actor: Wen Jiabao , a controversial book that cast a critical light on the premier, landed in hot water with the Chinese authorities, and had to emigrate to the USA for his own safety. His close friend and Nobel Prize-winning literary critic Liu Xiaobo called for politic...

The Thinking Man’s Bible and Messiah: A Personal Reading of Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” (Part 1)

A great many clichés we usually associate with Nietzsche – “God is dead” (often quoted out of context), “Man must be overcome,” “the Übermensch ” – have their origin in the infamous 1883-5 text Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None ( Also sprach Zarathustra: Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen ). It is a “treatise” generally ignored by professional philosophers for being “too artistic”; for the common reader, if he is not religious, it is a trying reading experience due to its cryptic nature, and if he is a believer in God, a full-frontal attack. It is a text many have heard of (and think they can quote from it), but few have seriously read from cover to cover. My aim is to synopsise some its recurring (pun intended) messages and explain why it is essential reading – now more than ever – for any man who strives to rise above himself and others. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is a literary/philosophical bulldozer: it attempts to raze to the ground all extant mora...